Steve Jobs introduced the Apple iPad today. I just got done watching the video of the keynote. Here are my impressions.
The name: terrible. I mean, truly terrible. Tampon jokes were all the rage online and even in the office this afternoon. iPad. Seriously? I mean, yes, I get it, it's close to iPod-with-an-O, but really. It's as if Apple hired the supergenius at Microsoft who came up with such brilliant product names as WinCE and WinME. Urgh.
The physical form factor: very nice indeed, if rather unimaginative. Perfectly in keeping with the Steve's minimalist aesthetic, and purposely evocative of the iPhone, with which it shares an OS and an App Store. It's a bit more square than I was expecting, but then again it's similar in size to a sheet of paper, which is probably not an accident. 1.5 lbs is not a lot, though I suspect it will grow a bit heavy in younger or weaker hands if used for lengthy periods. Most of the people demoing the device have been seated with their legs up or crossed, and again, I don't think that's an accident.
I was a little surprised by the absence of a GPS or a camera, but Apple's not pitching this device as a big alternative to an iPhone. Having a GPS in an iPhone is a necessity, as far as I'm concerned, but I don't think I'd be checking for directions on an iPad (agggh). Nor holding it up to try to take substandard photos. It would've been nice to have a front-facing camera for web conferencing. Maybe the next version.
The display: beautiful, if the reports are correct. The iPad (gah, I hate that name) uses an IPS LCD screen with an LED backlight. IPS is also used in the top end photographic quality LCD monitors for its extremely wide viewing angle and excellent light transmittance. It's big enough to be useful, and it's full color. The bezel is quite large, which seems to be giving some people fits, but it's not a cell phone. There has to be a lip around the display area for your fingers to hold onto without intruding on the screen, after all.
The OS: a disappointment in only one (but profoundly important) area: no multitasking. I understand it to some degree in the case of the iPhone. It's a much more limited device with severely constrained resources, and Apple doesn't want third party apps degrading the performance of the built-in apps such as the telephone or the iPod player (which, unlike most iPhone apps, can run while in the background). Considering the much more capable processor in the iPad (yrch, that name!) I think the absence of multitasking is a real problem. However, I think it will eventually be rectified (more on this later).
The operating system seems perfectly capable in almost every other way. The hands-on demo I saw on Engadget's web site proved that the performance of an iPad-optimized app is very good—surprisingly good, in fact. I doubt anyone will have anything to complain about when using the iPad iWork apps (Pages, Numbers and Keynote). In fact, it was seeing those apps being used during Steve's keynote that convinced me that the iPad really is a fully capable handheld computer.
The lack of multitasking, though—it really stands out like a sore thumb when you can use apps like Pages or Numbers, and it will be missed all the more because of it. Unless those apps go into suspended mode when you switch to another (to Mail, for example, to get some figures for your nascent spreadsheet) and then come right back to where you left off, the absence of multitasking rises from annoyance to genuine impediment.
I'm guessing that we won't see multitasking as we know it until iPhone OS 4.0 is announced, if then. If Steve had shown an iPhone OS device with multitasking today, people would be smashing down the doors to get it on the iPhone as well. Previous Stevenotes give strong evidence that he doesn't like to pollute a brand new product launch with big news about other platforms.
I doubt iPhone OS 4 is ready for prime time in any case. I suspect they'll announce the next iPhone (with OS 4) in March or April. They debuted iPhone OS 3 on March 17 of last year, for example. I don't have any evidence for my belief that multitasking will eventually arrive, but I hope it will, and I suspect they'll release an iPad update with multitasking at the same time iPhone 4G (or whatever it'll be called) will ship.
I'm more confident that the iPad (blorgh) is a very good device after seeing the whole keynote than I was just hearing about it from blogs. Lots and lots of people seem to hate it, though, and mostly because it's "just" a big iPod Touch. Although it looks like an iPod Touch and can run iPod and iPhone apps, it's much more than that. It's far, far bigger, much faster, and altogether more powerful. It's like comparing an entry level MacBook with a Mac Pro tower.
And what the haters are decrying as a problem is really a big advantage, both for users and developers. Consider: if you can use an iPod Touch or an iPhone, you can use an iPad with no additional training. No complex gestures to learn, no new UI design metaphor save the additions of some pop-up menu elements and other bric-a-brac. Developers don't have to learn a whole new OS SDK to program apps for it. The demos shown by the third-party developers Apple invited to port their apps to the iPad (blech) prove that. Less than three weeks and they all had very functional-looking programs running.
So how did I do in my predictions from the last blog post?
There was no special emphasis on education, in spite of the demo of a book reader app. I guess Steve figures that the ed market will take care of itself. There was a demo of Brushes, which was quite impressive, and I think that artists will flock to the iPad (ugh) once even more spectacular drawing and painting apps make their appearance. No stylus (not that I ever thought the probability was high), and therefore no handwriting recognition. I guess it makes sense, considering how much faster and more accurate even an on-screen virtual keyboard is than handwriting.
I was pleasantly surprised to see that Apple DID announce a keyboard dock for the iPad (aieeee). No mention of a mouse, of course. At first I was puzzled by the omission of a mouse, but there's just no mouse function in the Cocoa Touch framework. That's what your fingers are for. I suspect this will make certain operations on documents rather awkward at first, but I also suspect we'll get over it.
I quote myself: "Connectivity will be familiar: WiFi built in, with 3G as an option. There will be an iPod dock, a sim card slot, volume and mute controls, and a home button. And that's it." I forgot the built-in microphone, and I didn't expect a 16 GB cheapie model, but otherwise I nailed it. Maybe I should be a computer journalist.
I also expected iWork: "The iTablet will be able to play music and movies and run iPhone apps, but it must also be able to handle word processing and note taking and spreadsheet functions, too. I expect these apps to be available on the iTunes Store for a lower cost than their Mac-based predecessors. I also expect them to be optimized for use with a touch interface."
The iBook app is sweet. The iBook Store is very impressive, being on the "flip side" of the iBook's virtual bookshelf. Nifty UI, that. It's like the door into Victor Frankenstein's secret laboratory. It remains to be seen how readable the books are, but at least there won't be any complaints about lack of backlighting.
As an ebook reader goes, the iPad (ptui) is a mixed bag. Its UI is far superior to that of anything else I've seen, but the battery life of the device is much shorter than that of any e-ink reader. No surprise there. I'm wondering just how relevant that is, though. I think book reading will be a definite "also ran" application for the iPad (snort) compared to web browsing, game playing, etc. Recharging it rather frequently is going to happen no matter what. Still, ten hours of battery life while watching video is pretty impressive, and I imagine if you're just reading books on it the battery would last even longer. We'll have to see.
In summary, I think the gadget is very cool, wretched name notwithstanding. It's not an out-of-the-park home run. I'd call it a triple. I'd definitely prefer to take it on a trip than a full-fledged laptop. I've had occasion to use my iPhone to VPN into the office network and ssh into servers to do system administration work. I'm looking forward to the iPad version of iSSH.
Hey, I finally wrote "iPad" without twitching. Maybe I can get used to the name. Maybe.
(Uck)
Or not.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Predictions for the Mac Tablet
I've been watching the frenzied speculation about Apple's forthcoming tablet computer with great amusement. Everyone is making learned pronouncements about why it will either blow away the competition or fail miserably in the total absence of concrete information. All we know for sure is that various hardware manufacturers and parts suppliers have received orders for something that's small and probably tablet-shaped.
A lot of people think tablets are useless, or at best no real improvement over a traditional laptop with an integrated keyboard. Up to now, that's been true, save for a very limited niche of vertical market applications such as data entry for doctors, shippers, point of sale systems, and the like. Certainly Steve Ballmer's demo of a lackluster HP "slate" computer at CES last week does nothing to make me think that the PC vendors have anything innovative on their road maps. Skepticism over this product category is well-deserved.
Why shouldn't Apple ship a netbook? Because it's not interesting, and it's not especially profitable. All the netbooks I've seen to date have been grossly underpowered, poorly built, and include inferior keyboards that might fit a child's hands, but would be purest agony for a touch typist with normal- to large-sized fingers. Commodity PC vendors are used to low margins, but Apple isn't. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing is immaterial; it's the way Apple works.
Apple will only ship a tablet if it can perform well in the tasks for which it was designed, and if they can make money on it. A certain percentage of their user base will buy a tablet regardless of its real functionality, but the engineering and resources needed to build a serious tablet are significant. Apple won't invest that kind of money unless they believe they can recoup the investment. In order to do that, their tablet will have to have some compelling functionality that makes it appealing for a broad audience of prospective buyers.
Let's assume that the rumors are true and that Apple will announce a tablet on January 26 or 27. I'm going to go on record right now with my predictions (and desires) for such a device. Let's see if I can beat the prognosticators. Bearing in mind that there are already millions of iPod Touch and iPhone users out there, I think we can safely assume that the iTablet will have significant functionality beyond what those devices offer.
Physically, I expect the rumors to be largely correct. It will be around 10 inches diagonally, with a wide-screen aspect ratio and a capacitative multitouch display, probably LCD. I think the chances of Apple using OLED are slight, considering how immature that technology is, and the peculiar problems it has with overblown red and orange. Apple has always put a high premium on color matching. Future versions might use Pixel Qi or Mirasol or one of the other novel types of displays that work in sunlight as well as indoor light, but I don't think those vendors are quite ready to ship enough displays to meet what Apple hopes will be significant demand. With luck, the glass will be Corning's Gorilla Glass, which is infinitely more robust than the kind used in the iPhone.
The keyboard will be on-screen. I am ambivalent about whether a physical keyboard (perhaps with an integrated dock) will be an option. On the one hand, it would make the iTablet useful as a smaller substitute for a notebook computer without requiring the user to have miniscule digits to be able to type comfortably. On the other hand, if the iTablet is really in the $700-$1000 price range, it may cannibalize sales of the entry level MacBooks, especially if it's usable as a full-fledged multi-purpose computer. For this reason I'm leaning slightly toward Apple limiting the machine to a glorified iPhone OS with a virtual keyboard, but I hope I'm wrong.
I think there is a small possibility that Apple will also include a touch-sensitive stylus, or at least offer one as an option. Styli are problematic, but they would make the iTablet far more useful for artwork and graphic design, and Apple values those capabilities. That being said, there are significant usability and engineering challenges with styli. A multitouch display must be able to reject all input except that provided by the stylus itself. Ideally the stylus would be pressure and tilt-sensitive, a la the Wacom Cintiq displays, and given the power budget of a portable device it's unlikely that a Wacom-style sensor could be included. Perhaps a rechargeable Bluetooth stylus could be made, with software that disables the multitouch functions when the stylus is in use.
Even if there is no physical stylus, I expect that Apple will provide a means to use your finger as a far-less-precise substitute. Handwriting recognition will probably be there via Inkwell. A finger can certainly be used for handwriting on a ten-inch display. Or a third party software vendor might provide something like Inklet, which is already available for use on the MacBook trackpad.
Connectivity will be familiar: WiFi built in, with 3G as an option. There will be an iPod dock, a sim card slot, volume and mute controls, and a home button. And that's it. As much as users want expandable storage, I don't think Apple will go for it. I expect models with 32 and 64 GB of user storage. If we're lucky, 128 will be the high end. I don't think Apple will include user-expandable storage via an SD card slot, but I sincerely hope I'm wrong. Jobs has certain prejudices against this kind of thing, and I think he will prevail, as usual. This is not what I want, but what I expect.
I think Apple will have built iTablet versions of iWork and perhaps iPhoto. They may even make a new version of MacPaint available. Apple knows that one of its key markets is creative professionals, but they must also realize that basic business applications are an absolute must for a higher-end portable computing device. The iTablet will be able to play music and movies and run iPhone apps, but it must also be able to handle word processing and note taking and spreadsheet functions, too. I expect these apps to be available on the iTunes Store for a lower cost than their Mac-based predecessors. I also expect them to be optimized for use with a touch interface.
Steve Jobs has always been big into education, and I expect the iTablet to be aimed squarely at that market. Thus the iTablet will include apps that are useable in schools. If I were him, I'd provide free versions of dictionaries (in multiple languages), an atlas and internet-enabled gazetteer, a note taking app with handwriting recognition, and a graphing calculator. I expect a number of third-party software vendors to show up touting their iTablet versions of Mathematica, teaching applications, and the like.
I also expect Apple to announce a new technology for viewing print media, with an emphasis on textbooks. A great way to make the iTablet a compelling sale is to make it possible for students to buy e-textbooks instead of having to cart around a heavy backpack full of monstrous physical volumes. Of course, this will only be practical if the battery life of the device is very good, and if it can sustain a very large number of recharges without requiring a battery replacement.
If there is an emphasis on education, I would expect the iTablet to include printing functions. In fact I'd expect its OS to be much more full-featured than the iPhone OS, but with a touch-centered UI. This also leads me to think that a docking station with integrated keyboard and mouse is a reasonable possibility. After all, you can't exactly expect students to key in a book report using a virtual keyboard. If Apple does announce such a device, I expect it to include a physical lock so both the iTablet and the dock can be secured.
I also expect Apple to announce either an e-book store or to demo third-party book-reader apps with in-application purchasing capability that bypasses the iTunes Store. Apple already made this capability available for the iPhone in version 3.0 of the software. Apple may not want to lock itself into a home-grown media reader. There's already a version of Kindle for the iPhone; it doesn't take a big stretch of the imagination to see that they would want to port it to the iTablet.
In any case, the iTablet will be wicked cool. Apple will want to blow all of the other tablet manufacturers into the water, and based on Steve Enballmer's demo of the HP Slate at CES this January, that won't be too hard.
So that's it. I'll post a follow-up message once the iTablet has been revealed to see how wide of the mark my guesses are. :-)
A lot of people think tablets are useless, or at best no real improvement over a traditional laptop with an integrated keyboard. Up to now, that's been true, save for a very limited niche of vertical market applications such as data entry for doctors, shippers, point of sale systems, and the like. Certainly Steve Ballmer's demo of a lackluster HP "slate" computer at CES last week does nothing to make me think that the PC vendors have anything innovative on their road maps. Skepticism over this product category is well-deserved.
Why shouldn't Apple ship a netbook? Because it's not interesting, and it's not especially profitable. All the netbooks I've seen to date have been grossly underpowered, poorly built, and include inferior keyboards that might fit a child's hands, but would be purest agony for a touch typist with normal- to large-sized fingers. Commodity PC vendors are used to low margins, but Apple isn't. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing is immaterial; it's the way Apple works.
Apple will only ship a tablet if it can perform well in the tasks for which it was designed, and if they can make money on it. A certain percentage of their user base will buy a tablet regardless of its real functionality, but the engineering and resources needed to build a serious tablet are significant. Apple won't invest that kind of money unless they believe they can recoup the investment. In order to do that, their tablet will have to have some compelling functionality that makes it appealing for a broad audience of prospective buyers.
Let's assume that the rumors are true and that Apple will announce a tablet on January 26 or 27. I'm going to go on record right now with my predictions (and desires) for such a device. Let's see if I can beat the prognosticators. Bearing in mind that there are already millions of iPod Touch and iPhone users out there, I think we can safely assume that the iTablet will have significant functionality beyond what those devices offer.
Physically, I expect the rumors to be largely correct. It will be around 10 inches diagonally, with a wide-screen aspect ratio and a capacitative multitouch display, probably LCD. I think the chances of Apple using OLED are slight, considering how immature that technology is, and the peculiar problems it has with overblown red and orange. Apple has always put a high premium on color matching. Future versions might use Pixel Qi or Mirasol or one of the other novel types of displays that work in sunlight as well as indoor light, but I don't think those vendors are quite ready to ship enough displays to meet what Apple hopes will be significant demand. With luck, the glass will be Corning's Gorilla Glass, which is infinitely more robust than the kind used in the iPhone.
The keyboard will be on-screen. I am ambivalent about whether a physical keyboard (perhaps with an integrated dock) will be an option. On the one hand, it would make the iTablet useful as a smaller substitute for a notebook computer without requiring the user to have miniscule digits to be able to type comfortably. On the other hand, if the iTablet is really in the $700-$1000 price range, it may cannibalize sales of the entry level MacBooks, especially if it's usable as a full-fledged multi-purpose computer. For this reason I'm leaning slightly toward Apple limiting the machine to a glorified iPhone OS with a virtual keyboard, but I hope I'm wrong.
I think there is a small possibility that Apple will also include a touch-sensitive stylus, or at least offer one as an option. Styli are problematic, but they would make the iTablet far more useful for artwork and graphic design, and Apple values those capabilities. That being said, there are significant usability and engineering challenges with styli. A multitouch display must be able to reject all input except that provided by the stylus itself. Ideally the stylus would be pressure and tilt-sensitive, a la the Wacom Cintiq displays, and given the power budget of a portable device it's unlikely that a Wacom-style sensor could be included. Perhaps a rechargeable Bluetooth stylus could be made, with software that disables the multitouch functions when the stylus is in use.
Even if there is no physical stylus, I expect that Apple will provide a means to use your finger as a far-less-precise substitute. Handwriting recognition will probably be there via Inkwell. A finger can certainly be used for handwriting on a ten-inch display. Or a third party software vendor might provide something like Inklet, which is already available for use on the MacBook trackpad.
Connectivity will be familiar: WiFi built in, with 3G as an option. There will be an iPod dock, a sim card slot, volume and mute controls, and a home button. And that's it. As much as users want expandable storage, I don't think Apple will go for it. I expect models with 32 and 64 GB of user storage. If we're lucky, 128 will be the high end. I don't think Apple will include user-expandable storage via an SD card slot, but I sincerely hope I'm wrong. Jobs has certain prejudices against this kind of thing, and I think he will prevail, as usual. This is not what I want, but what I expect.
I think Apple will have built iTablet versions of iWork and perhaps iPhoto. They may even make a new version of MacPaint available. Apple knows that one of its key markets is creative professionals, but they must also realize that basic business applications are an absolute must for a higher-end portable computing device. The iTablet will be able to play music and movies and run iPhone apps, but it must also be able to handle word processing and note taking and spreadsheet functions, too. I expect these apps to be available on the iTunes Store for a lower cost than their Mac-based predecessors. I also expect them to be optimized for use with a touch interface.
Steve Jobs has always been big into education, and I expect the iTablet to be aimed squarely at that market. Thus the iTablet will include apps that are useable in schools. If I were him, I'd provide free versions of dictionaries (in multiple languages), an atlas and internet-enabled gazetteer, a note taking app with handwriting recognition, and a graphing calculator. I expect a number of third-party software vendors to show up touting their iTablet versions of Mathematica, teaching applications, and the like.
I also expect Apple to announce a new technology for viewing print media, with an emphasis on textbooks. A great way to make the iTablet a compelling sale is to make it possible for students to buy e-textbooks instead of having to cart around a heavy backpack full of monstrous physical volumes. Of course, this will only be practical if the battery life of the device is very good, and if it can sustain a very large number of recharges without requiring a battery replacement.
If there is an emphasis on education, I would expect the iTablet to include printing functions. In fact I'd expect its OS to be much more full-featured than the iPhone OS, but with a touch-centered UI. This also leads me to think that a docking station with integrated keyboard and mouse is a reasonable possibility. After all, you can't exactly expect students to key in a book report using a virtual keyboard. If Apple does announce such a device, I expect it to include a physical lock so both the iTablet and the dock can be secured.
I also expect Apple to announce either an e-book store or to demo third-party book-reader apps with in-application purchasing capability that bypasses the iTunes Store. Apple already made this capability available for the iPhone in version 3.0 of the software. Apple may not want to lock itself into a home-grown media reader. There's already a version of Kindle for the iPhone; it doesn't take a big stretch of the imagination to see that they would want to port it to the iTablet.
In any case, the iTablet will be wicked cool. Apple will want to blow all of the other tablet manufacturers into the water, and based on Steve Enballmer's demo of the HP Slate at CES this January, that won't be too hard.
So that's it. I'll post a follow-up message once the iTablet has been revealed to see how wide of the mark my guesses are. :-)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)